DETERMINANT FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH DIGITALIZATION OF LEADERSHIP COMMUNICATION AT HOSPITAL

Authors

  • Ni Luh Putu Inca Buntari Agustini Faculty of Health, Institute of Technology and Health Bali, Denpasar, Indonesia
  • Dewa Gede Wisnu Wardana Faculty of Health, Institute of Technology and Health Bali, Denpasar, Indonesia
  • I Gusti Ngurah Made Gusti Kusuma Negara Faculty of Health, Institute of Technology and Health Bali, Denpasar, Indonesia
  • Yustina Ni Putu Yusniawati Faculty of Health, Institute of Technology and Health Bali, Denpasar, Indonesia
  • Israfil Israfil Faculty of Health, Institute of Technology and Health Bali, Denpasar, Indonesia
  • I Gede Putu Darma Suyasa Faculty of Health, Institute of Technology and Health Bali, Denpasar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36720/nhjk.v14i2.768

Keywords:

Communication, Digitalization, enthusiasm, Leadership

Abstract

Background: The digital era has accelerated the digitalization of organizational processes, including leadership communication. The emergence of digital leadership requires leaders to adapt their communication and leadership styles to dynamic, technology-mediated work environments. In hospital settings, effective digital leadership communication is essential to support coordination, decision-making, and quality nursing care.

Purpose: This study aimed to identify determinants associated with the digitalization of leadership communication in hospitals.

Methods: A cross-sectional study design was employed involving 131 nurses recruited through purposive sampling based on predefined inclusion criteria. Data were collected using structured questionnaires measuring leadership style, communication style, leadership skills, leader enthusiasm, and the implementation of digital leadership communication. Statistical analyses included the Spearman rho test, contingency coefficient, and multiple logistic regression to examine associations between variables.

Results: The findings indicated that 94.7% of respondents perceived the implementation of digital leadership communication as good. Leadership style showed a moderate positive correlation with digital leadership communication (p = 0.000; r = 0.512). Communication style was not significantly associated with digital leadership communication (p = 0.434; r = 0.068). Leadership skills demonstrated a strong positive relationship (p = 0.000; r = 0.589), while leader enthusiasm showed the strongest association (p = 0.000; r = 0.698). Multivariate analysis confirmed that leadership skills and enthusiasm were the most influential determinants.

Conclusion: Leader enthusiasm and leadership skills are key determinants of effective digitalization of leadership communication in hospital settings. Strengthening these competencies may enhance digital leadership practices and improve organizational communication in healthcare institutions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbas, R., & Miller, T. (2025). Exploring communication inefficiencies in disaster response: Perspectives of emergency managers and health professionals. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 120, 105393. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105393

Abhari, K. (2025). Employee Participation in Digital Transformation: From Digitalization Sentiment to Transformation Predisposition. Inf. Manag., 62(8), 104212. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2025.104212

Badrinarayanan, V. (2024). Trust building strategies for virtual leaders in the post pandemic era. Proj. Leadersh. Soc., 5, 100126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2024.100126

Bauwens, R., & Cortellazzo, L. (2025). The different faces of e‑leadership: Six perspectives on leading in the era of digital technologies. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev., 35(1), 101058. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2024.101058

Cahyarini, F. D. (2021). Implementasi digital leadership dalam pengembangan kompetensi digital pada pelayanan publik. J. Stud. Komun. Media., 25(1), 47-60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31445/jskm.2021.3780

Graesser, A. C., Fiore, S. M., Greiff, S., Andrews-Todd, J., Foltz, P. W., & Hesse, F. W. (2018). Advancing the Science of Collaborative Problem Solving. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest., 19(2), 59-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618808244

Greimel, N. S., Kanbach, D. K., & Chelaru, M. (2023). Virtual teams and transformational leadership: An integrative literature review and avenues for further research. J. Innov. Knowl., 8(2), 100351. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100351

Hidayatullah, S., & Toni, A. (2023). Leader Communication Strategy in Implementing Digital Management. MEDIASI J. Kaji. Terap. Media Bahasa Komun., 4(2), 174-187.

Musaigwa, M., & Kalitanyi, V. (2024). Effective leadership in the digital era: an exploration of change management. Technol. Audit Prod. Reserves, 1(4/75), 6-14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15587/2706-5448.2024.297374

Nieken, P. (2022). Digital leadership: Motivating online workers. IZA World Labor. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.498

Oshame, D., & Maureen, O. (2023). Critical analysis of four leadership theories and principles. World J. Adv. Res. Rev., 17(01), 1387-1395. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2023.17.1.0187

Pettersen, I. J., & Solstad, E. (2023). From relationship orientation to task orientation: On the digitalization of clinical leaders. Financ. Account. Manag., 39(1), 151-166. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12305

Rodino, M. (1997). Breaking out of binaries: Reconceptualizing gender and its relationship to language in computer-mediated communication. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun., 3(3), JCMC333. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00074.x

Rolin, K. (2009). Standpoint theory as a methodology for the study of power relations. Hypatia, 24(4), 218-226. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.01070.x

Sacavém, A., de Bem Machado, A., dos Santos, J. R., Palma-Moreira, A., Belchior-Rocha, H., & Au-Yong-Oliveira, M. (2025). Leading in the Digital Age: The Role of Leadership in Organizational Digital Transformation. Adm. Sci., 15(2), 43. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/15/2/43

Santos, J. V. L. (2021). Contingency theories of leadership: Effectiveness of the college instructor’s leadership style. Educatio J. Educ., 6(2), 107-113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.29138/educatio.v6i2.401

Solstad, E., Pettersen, I. J., & Robbins, G. (2021). Hospitals as professional organizations and the perception of distances. Financ. Account. Manag., 37(1), 20-36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12234

Sumner, E. M., & Ramirez, A. (2017). Social information processing theory and hyperpersonal perspective. Educatio. J. Educ. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.29138/educatio.v6i2.401

Tsolka, A. (2020). Contingency and Situational Approaches to Educational Leadership. In: Oxford University Press.

Wang, X., Liu, Y., Peng, Z., Li, B., Liang, Q., Liao, S., & Liu, M. (2024). Situational leadership theory in nursing management: a scoping review. BMC Nurs., 23(1), 930. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02582-9

Zia, A., Memon, M. A., Mirza, M. Z., Iqbal, Y. M. J., & Tariq, A. (2025). Digital job resources, digital engagement, digital leadership, and innovative work behaviour: a serial mediation model. Eur. J. Innov. Manag., 28(8), 3192-3216. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-04-2023-0311

Downloads

Published

2025-12-29

How to Cite

Agustini, N. L. P. I. B., Wardana, D. G. W., Negara, I. G. N. M. G. K., Yusniawati, Y. N. P., Israfil, I., & Suyasa, I. G. P. D. (2025). DETERMINANT FACTORS ASSOCIATED WITH DIGITALIZATION OF LEADERSHIP COMMUNICATION AT HOSPITAL. Nurse and Health: Jurnal Keperawatan, 14(2), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.36720/nhjk.v14i2.768

Citation Check

Most read articles by the same author(s)